The Rolling Stones (1962-Present)

Disregarding the fact that the Stones basically mimicked everything the Beatles did, I think these guys are creative. They've always been known as the "bad boys" of classic rock, which I don't see it. Sure, they did tons of bad drugs, but they shouldn't be known for that. They should be known for how they copy bands. Don't get me wrong, I really like their songs. But they literally plagirazed the little "Boy Band" concept. Take this, for example, In 1964, The Beatles make thier debut in America, one year after, The Stones come to America. In 1967, The Monkees go psychedelic, around a week later, The Stones go psychadelic. Even in these days, thay came back performing after all the same bands started again.

They are most certainly not my favorite. If I had a top 100 favorite classic rock bands list, they'd be situated in the 70-80 area. So yeah, I'm not a fan. Having said that, I think their music is alright.

As an example, their song "Sympathy For The Devil" is genius. If you listen to the lyrics it really changes the perspectiveon what you think Satan really is. He isn't some demon monster guy with horns, he's seen as a suave person who is cruel inside.

There are many songs of theirs that contain a lot of symbolism, and that's one thing that makes them alright.

Members:

-Mick Jagger: This guy perfectly defines "A ladies man". He slept with around 4,000 women (And David Bowie, but that's just a rumour.). Sexual facts aside, his voice isn't my favorite. I find it whiny and fraud. He forces it too much and it just sounds like a screaming baby. He seems like a nice guy though.

-Keith Richards: I don't know how Keith is still alive to be honest. He's done so many illegal drugs it's not even humanly possible. I find his guitar playing to be very vibrant. His solos are so colourful, that you can basically feel the energy from it. It really gets you hyper. It's almost magical. But you know what else is magical? the fact that he's STILL doing drugs at his age and is still full of life. I tell ya, it's crazy how his lungs stilll work.

-Brian Jones: After his rather quick death in 1969, I belive the band went downhill. Brian was really the pillars of the Rolling Stones. His songwriting skills are absolutely brilliant. But I'm certain drugs were involved with him as well.

-Charlie Watts: A frugal drummer, his fills could be a lot better. His beats could be a bit more complex. But hey, he isn't too bad.

-Ronnie Wood: Not really familiar with him, but I hear he has a talk show. I don't like the fact that he just squeezed into the band after Brian died, but he's a fun musician.

To conclude, They aren't the best, but they're not the worst. They don't have much originality media-wise, but musically, they're extremely innovative. They're also one of the longest lasting groups of music history.

Rate:

5 Brown Sugars out of 10

The Doors (1965-1972)

Despite having a short timeline of music, The Doors managed to drift into the psychedelic era without a problem. I always saw The Doors as Nirvana mixed with The Rolling Stones. The band's rebellious vibe they set out isn't exactly my favorite thing about them, but hey, they play good music. Although they aren't my favorite, there are at least SOME pros about them.

The keyboard really glues everything together with their songs.  Honestly, I doubt they could've gotten popular without that ''odd'' feel the keyboards gave them.

I wouldn't exactly see them as an 'Influential' band. Their lyrics aren't worth studying. (Honestly I think Morrison was too stoned to write good lyrics with actual meaning.) I see them as more of a fun band. Imagine a Doors record emitting through the room when you had a rather tough day, that right there is an ideal scenario for a good time to listen to them.

Their discography is very slim. They weren't around for long, I gotta say. But when they were around, they were a very enjoyable band. Their live performances are super hilarious to watch, for example:

-Jim Morrison: Jim was really something else. In my opinion, he wasn't really as ahead of his time than people say he was. But he was a really mediocre kind of guy. I'm not really a fan of him, yet I don't hate him. His voice really stood out for The Doors, it personified the group. All in all, I always saw him as a drugee who thinks he made a difference in the world.

-Ray Manzarek: As I said before, the keyboards really shaped up the sound in this band. And this organ player really did an astounding job with it. A very classically gifted keyboardist, indeed.

-John Densmore: This drummer is pretty skillful. His fills are well executed most of the time. And his style is very conservative. His beats sound like any ordinary jazz percussionist, but he does them well.

-Robby Krieger: Now this guy isn't no Hendrix, but I give him credit. He dealt with all the member's problems like nothing. If there was an argument, he solved it in no time. He's an 'ok' guitarist. Not really a unique style, but I like him. He's alright.

The Doors are a very joyful band that really gets you up if you're down. I highly recommend them if you enjoy classic rock from the 60's. They defined the psychedelic era, with all the hippies and ''Flower Power''.

Rate:

6 Peace Frogs out of 10

( Quick Sidenote: When I rate the bands, the object I'm rating them with has to do with a song or an album they made. Hence the song ''Peace Frog''. So for the rcord, I'm not just putting whatever comes to mind LeL)

Led Zeppelin (1968-1980)

Where do I even begin with this group? Words aren't sufficent to describe the greatness of this band. I always pictured this band as a supergroup of the greatest musicians of all time.
Like someone just got some very talented people and said "Hey, you four! you guys are in a band now."
And they sort of just went with it. And boy, did that create an amzing thing.
This british rock band never failed to make a good tune. And these tunes were WAYYY ahead of their time. If they made songs during the 2010's, the world woul STILL be astounded by their talent. Plus, the members just....fit. I can't think of anyone else who could've worked better with Robert Plant or Jimmy Page.

Though they're greatly umderrated, I believe that Led Zeppelin could represent every band that has ever been made. They're The Beatles mixed with The Rolling Stones. The Who mixed with Black Sabbath.

Members:

-Robert Plant: He's possibly the universe's best vocalist that has ever lived. This guy is a legend.He might've had the best solo career of the four, (Excluding Bonham, because well, he died). But still, it's noticeable that all the singing took a toll on his voice. I'll be honest, it's not the greatest singing voice anymore. But when he was in his prime, it was almost unbelievable.

-Jimmy Page: Weird sexual harrassment lawsuits aside, Jimmy was a very talented guitarist. His style paved the road for future guitarists like Slash, Carlos Santana and Ace Frehly. Mostly known for playing his double necked guitar (shown below), his distinct style was unique and very innovative. I find him very underrated as a musician. He truly is an excellent artist.

-John Paul Jones: I don't know much about this member, but from what I can comprehend, he just played bass and keyboards occasionally. I find him to be very lucky. He's in a group with three rock and roll legends.


-John Bonham: I saved the best for last. This drummer has skills that not even Neil Peart can achieve. I always called him the Messiah of drumming. This man has god-like rythym. Nobody can surpass him in a drum-off, and that's a guarantee. He makes Buddy Rich look like an amateur with his incredible fills and triplets. One of my favorite Zepplin songs features an unbelievably long drum solo, (It's probably why it's my favorite).

In conclusion, If you're new to classic rock, I highly reccomend giving these guys a listen LATER ON. That way there, if you start off listening to them, your expectations will be too high for other possible bands. These musicians are godly and  better than most music you hear today.

Rate:

 9 Coda's out of 10